Monday, November 1, 2010
Pax Americana?
This whole notion of a Pax Americana, I think, is a flawed one. Was the 20th century truly the American century? Hardly. 1/5 of the century was spent in isolationism, and half of it in direct competition with the Soviet Union in which the USA repeatedly failed to win in Korea, China and S.E. Asia. Ultimately influence in Iran would be lost as well. The whole of Asia minus some islands off the coast and, maybe, Pakistan, was outside the influence of the USA. Influence in Africa was hardly solidified and only half of Europe was ever, barely somewhat, in league with the USA. How exactly a century could be defined as American when 80 miles offshore, its archenemy is deploying nuclear warheads?
In short, there never was an American century. Calling the 20th century the American Century is like pushing the Pax Romana back 200 years to when Carthage was still around. There was a period of time from 1990-2010, 80 years short of a century, when America stood unopposed by any major power and this short period was more the product of the vacuum effect of the collapse of the Soviet Union. A vacuum being more suitably filled by the regional powers who's backyard it is in.
The rise of China and India, the competition of the EU and resurrection of Russia are a return to the normalcy of a competitive world. The 'American century' was a mere 20 year hiccup where the USA faced no real competition and these characteristics can not be applied across the span of the 20th century.
Monday, September 27, 2010
China in the footsteps of the Kaiser
"Is China the best friend of American power?
Beijing’s recent missteps in Asia — moving ahead with reactor sales to troubled Pakistan and crudely threatening Japan over the arrest of a Chinese fishing captain — are swiftly solidifying America’s Asian alliances. The new Japanese government came into office hoping to rebalance Japan’s foreign policy and reduce tensions with China. That dream is now dead. And China’s deepening relationship with Pakistan, intended in part as a counter to America’s nuclear opening to India, is driving Asia’s other emerging nuclear power closer than ever into the arms of America (and Japan). South Korea, once drifting peacefully toward China, has moved back towards the United States following China’s support for Pyongyang after the sinking of a South Korean naval boat.
In all this there is one clear theme. America isn’t containing China. China is containing itself. As China’s economy grows and its military develops new capacities, it is looking for ways to turn that potential power into actual power over events. In the past, China has tried to attract its neighbors into its orbit with sweeteners like trade deals and aid."
Thursday, September 23, 2010
France and her colonies
On the recent events in Niger.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
On the impact of Turkey's Referendum
http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/columnists-221677-the-end-of-facade-democracy-in-turkey.html
Monday, September 13, 2010
Big changes for Turkey
The above video breaks down the newly accepted changes in Turkey's constitution.
Japanese-Chinese relations souring
Read More.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Hezbollah South of the Border?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/1/hezbollah-car-bombs-on-our-border/
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Railroad Diplomacy
Read the article on Chinese Railroad Diplomacy here.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
A European Military
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3118476/UK-and-France-tobr-share-aircraft-carriers.html
Monday, August 30, 2010
Lessons from China's economic ascendecy
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/29/AR2010082902898.html
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Monday, August 23, 2010
Venezuela more deadly than Iraq or Mexico
Read about it here.
Friday, August 20, 2010
The Taiwan-China issue
5 barriers to a Russian-Western partnership
Read the article here.
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Arms Sales and Peace in the Middle East
To sum it up, it details the pending sale of arms to Saudi Arabia as part of a new US policy to build up regional alliances to counter an Iranian threat. It also makes mention of the initial Israeli hostility to such a sale, fearing that the US weapons could be used against Israel, rather than Iran. However, Israel has backed down its opposition in the face of a new Iranian threat, which it apparently deems far greater.
So it has occurred to me that the latest US solution to the middle eastern problem is to create a common enemy and a sort of little entente in the middle east to counter what it regards as a threat to its interests abroad.
However things aren't so pleasant in the middle east for such a 'little entente' to work out so smoothly. Recently, US-Turkish relations are souring over issues like the recent flotilla incident and the recurring Armenian Genocide bill. And in Iraq, the situation is threatening to prevent US withdrawal, after all, does the United States truly want a weak neighbor on the border with Iran? In order to prevent the problem which plagued the original Little Entente, the USA is going to need to have strong nations to work with towards a common goal, as seen with the recent strengthening of Saudi Arabia. But pulling out of Iraq too early could prove fatal and provoke conflict between the two nations which have a past. It is certainly a juggling act the USA has taken on, but whether or not it will pay off remains to be seen.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
India is preparing for another war with China
Read the article here.
Friday, August 13, 2010
Using Google Earth to Spy on N. Korea
Check it out here:
http://www.nkeconwatch.com/north-korea-uncovered-google-earth/
Saturday, August 7, 2010
China reacts to Hanoi-Washington Deal
Washington has confirmed it in negotiation a deal with Vietnam similar to the one it has signed with India. The move has implications for India, which faced Chinese resistance to its nuclear deal with the US. India is also wary about what it regards as China's non-transparent move to sell two more nuclear reactors to Pakistan.
Read the article here...
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Washington and Hanoi to reach Nuclear Agreement
The deal has been under discussion for several months following Hanoi's announcement of plans to build 14 nuclear stations over the next 20 years, according to the Wall Street Journal."
I found this an interesting read considering the USA and Vietnam's past as well as the current situation with Iran. Apparently, the USA is willing to work with totalitarian states to spread nuclear technology. Given all the rhetoric over the past ten years (note that talks began in 2001 under Bush) you'd think such a move would never happen...
